Analysis Summary
MiniMax M1 is a long-context reasoning model with a one-million-token window, tool use, and function calling. Its mathematical performance and LiveCodeBench result make it more capable for technical work than its general intelligence index suggests, while the text-only interface keeps deployment straightforward.
The model fits codebase exploration, document-heavy analysis, structured automation, and agent workflows that benefit from retaining large amounts of context. Function calling supports practical orchestration, but the low TerminalBench Hard result indicates that autonomous shell-based work needs supervision. Instruction following and long-context reliability are usable rather than exceptional for client-facing editorial production.
Pricing is moderate, with low input cost and a higher output rate. Adopt it for large-context technical workflows where context capacity and tool access matter more than polished general writing.
Assessed September 7, 2026
Editorial notes
MiniMax M1 combines a million-token context with tool use, function calling, and strong mathematical and coding results. It suits long-context automation and engineering tasks, though terminal reliability and general reasoning are less consistent than leading models.
Rankings consider pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and real-world applicability and are refreshed as new models launch. Feedback?
DFO Verdict
MiniMax M1 combines a million-token context with tool use, function calling, and strong mathematical and coding results. It suits long-context automation and engineering tasks, though terminal reliability and general reasoning are less consistent than leading models.
Benchmark scores
Magenta = intelligence · Ink = technical/agentic · Cyan = content & long-context · Grey = community benchmarks. Data: Artificial Analysis, Hugging Face.
17.7 Intelligence Index·18.6 Agentic Index·61 Math Index
How MiniMax: MiniMax M1 compares
MiniMax: MiniMax M1 ranks #149 of 438 AI models we track for overall intelligence, #93 of 192 for agentic tasks. Its 1M-token context window is larger than 83% of the models we list. At $0.40 per million input tokens it is cheaper than 42% of comparable models.
Dark bar = input · light bar = output, scaled to the priciest peer.
1M tokens ≈ 8 full-length novels or ~2,500 pages of business documents in a single request.
Strongest on value. The pulled-in technical corner is the trade-off, and if the shape matters more than the price, this is your model.
Compare shapes side-by-side →Pricing
| Token Type | Cost per 1M tokens | Cost per 1K tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.40 | $0.000400 |
| Output | $2.20 | $0.002200 |
What would MiniMax: MiniMax M1 cost your business?
Pick the job that looks most like yours, then fine-tune with the sliders. Estimates update live.
A website chatbot handling around 100 customer conversations a day, a few short messages each.
Full calculator with 776 models → Price Calculator
These numbers get smaller with the right architecture.
We route routine calls to cheap models and save MiniMax: MiniMax M1 for the hard ones. Most clients cut their estimate by 60-80%.
Talk to our teamAbout MiniMax: MiniMax M1
MiniMax-M1 is a large-scale, open-weight reasoning model designed for extended context and high-efficiency inference. It leverages a hybrid Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture paired with a custom "lightning attention" mechanism, allowing it..
Explore Related Models
Frequently asked questions about MiniMax: MiniMax M1
How much does MiniMax: MiniMax M1 cost?
MiniMax: MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens.
What is the context window of MiniMax: MiniMax M1?
MiniMax: MiniMax M1 has a context window of 1,000,000 tokens (1M).
What can MiniMax: MiniMax M1 do?
MiniMax: MiniMax M1 supports tool use and function calling.
Who created MiniMax: MiniMax M1?
MiniMax: MiniMax M1 is developed by MiniMax and was released on June 17, 2025.
Data sourced from the OpenRouter API, Artificial Analysis, the Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard and our own internal testing. Scores are editorially curated by our team.
Last updated: September 17, 2026 8:38 pm