Analysis Summary
Anthropic's Claude Haiku 4.5 is a multimodal model with a 200,000-token context window, vision, tool use, and function calling. Its coding index is 43.9 and its agentic index is 41, supported by useful live-coding and terminal benchmark results. The intelligence index is lower than its coding and agentic measures, indicating that its strongest use cases are practical execution and technical assistance rather than the hardest general reasoning tasks.
For client workflows, it is a capable candidate for coding support, tool-assisted automation, document analysis, and routine content production. The listed prices are moderate, making it more suitable for repeated calls than premium-priced research models. Teams should still route high-stakes reasoning to a stronger model and test outputs before publication. Haiku 4.5 fits well as a fast, cost-conscious production option for bounded tasks.
Assessed September 23, 2026
Editorial notes
Claude Haiku 4.5 pairs strong coding and agentic results with vision, function calling, and a 200K context window at lower listed prices than premium models.
The DFO score ranks models on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and is refreshed as new models launch. The write-up and verdict are our own. Feedback?
DFO Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5 pairs strong coding and agentic results with vision, function calling, and a 200K context window at lower listed prices than premium models.
Benchmarks
Artificial Analysis data refreshed Oct 23, 2026. Arena ratings from the Oct 20, 2026 text leaderboard, with style control. Bars: magenta = reasoning, ink = coding and agents, cyan = instructions and long context.
Artificial Analysis no longer lists this model, so its indexes are converted from their older scale to stay comparable.
How Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 compares
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 ranks #99 of 443 AI models we track for overall intelligence, #95 of 198 for coding, #37 of 181 for agentic tasks. Its 200K-token context window is larger than 55% of the models we list. At $1.00 per million input tokens it is cheaper than 25% of comparable models.
Dark bar = input · light bar = output, scaled to the priciest peer.
1M tokens ≈ 8 full-length novels or ~2,500 pages of business documents in a single request.
Pricing
| Token Type | Cost per 1M tokens | Cost per 1K tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $1.00 | $0.001000 |
| Output | $5.00 | $0.005000 |
What would Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 cost your business?
Pick the job that looks most like yours, then fine-tune with the sliders. Estimates update live.
A website chatbot handling around 100 customer conversations a day, a few short messages each.
Full calculator with 718 models → Price Calculator
These numbers get smaller with the right architecture.
We route routine calls to cheap models and save Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 for the hard ones. Most clients cut their estimate by 60-80%.
Talk to our teamAbout Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of larger Claude models. Matching Claude Sonnet 4’s performance..
Explore Related Models
Frequently asked questions about Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
How much does Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 cost?
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens.
What is the context window of Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5?
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 has a context window of 200,000 tokens (200K).
Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 good for coding?
On our coding benchmark index, Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 ranks #95 of 198 models, placing it in the broader range of the field for code generation and debugging.
What can Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 do?
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports image/vision input, tool use, and function calling.
Who created Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5?
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and was released on October 15, 2025.
Benchmarks from Artificial Analysis, pricing from the OpenRouter API, and verdicts from our own testing.
Last updated: October 23, 2026 8:39 pm