Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Analysis Summary
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. It was released in September 2025. On our leaderboard it earns Specialist-tier status, ranking #136 of 571 models in our overall business-suitability ranking. For raw reasoning ability it ranks #129 of 374, putting it in the upper half for overall intelligence.
On coding it ranks #144 of 311, a reasonable fit for everyday development support. It also ranks #151 of 286 for agentic, multi-step tasks ā the autonomous, tool-driven workflows that underpin business automation. Its 262K-token context window is larger than 81% of the models we list, suiting long documents, large codebases, and retrieval-heavy workloads. Crucially for business adoption, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking combines tool use, function calling, and step-by-step reasoning in a single model, letting teams consolidate several use cases instead of stitching together multiple services.
At $0.098 input and $0.780 output per 1M tokens, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is aggressively priced for high-volume use which makes it easy to justify for cost-sensitive, high-throughput deployments. Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is best deployed where its particular strengths line up with the task, rather than as a general-purpose frontier model.
Editorial notes
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking delivers strong math and livecodebench scores with a 262K context window at low cost, but agentic and coding indices are limited; a -4 point regional penalty applies given provider adoption profile.
Assessed May 31, 2026
Rankings consider pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and real-world applicability and are refreshed as new models launch. Feedback?
Performance Profile
How Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking compares
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks #129 of 374 AI models we track for overall intelligence, #144 of 311 for coding, #151 of 286 for agentic tasks. Its 262K-token context window is larger than 81% of the models we list. At $0.10 per million input tokens it is cheaper than 66% of comparable models.
About Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is a reasoning-first chat model in the Qwen3-Next line that outputs structured āthinkingā traces by default. Itās designed for hard multi-step problems; math proofs, code synthesis/debugging, logic, and agentic..
Capabilities
Performance Indices
Source: Artificial Analysis
Benchmark Scores
Intelligence
Technical
Content
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis and Hugging Face
How does Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking stack up?
Compare side-by-side with other specialist models.
Model Information
| OpenRouter ID |
qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking
|
| Provider | qwen |
| Release Date | September 11, 2025 |
| Context Length | 262,144 tokens |
| Max Completion | 32,768 tokens |
| Status | Active |
Pricing
| Token Type | Cost per 1M tokens | Cost per 1K tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.10 | $0.000098 |
| Output | $0.78 | $0.000780 |
Live Performance
Live endpoint metrics, refreshed every 30 minutes.
Leaderboard Categories
External Resources
Explore Related Models
Frequently asked questions about Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
How much does Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking cost?
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.78 per million output tokens.
What is the context window of Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a context window of 262,144 tokens (262K).
Is Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking good for coding?
On our coding benchmark index, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ranks #144 of 311 models, placing it in the broader range of the field for code generation and debugging.
What can Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking do?
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking supports tool use and function calling.
Who created Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen and was released on September 11, 2025.
Data sourced from OpenRouter API, Artificial Analysis and Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard. Scores are editorially curated by our team.
Last updated: June 5, 2026 8:38 pm