Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash
Analysis Summary
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash sits in the Efficient tier on our leaderboard, ranked #155 of 523 published models on overall intelligence. At $0.100 input and $0.400 output per 1M tokens, it is among the most expensive on the market. It offers an exceptionally large context window suited to long-document workflows and supports tool use, function calling, and vision.
Editorial notes
Gemini 2.0 Flash from Google offers multimodal input (text, image, audio, video), tool use, function calling, and a 1M token context at $0.10/1M input, making it a cost-effective option for content and tool-use tasks despite limited reasoning depth.
Assessed April 24, 2026
Rankings consider pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and real-world applicability and are refreshed as new models launch. Feedback?
Performance Profile
Gemini Flash 2.0 offers a significantly faster time to first token (TTFT) compared to Gemini Flash 1.5, while maintaining quality on par with larger models like Gemini Pro 1.5. It..
Capabilities
Benchmark Scores
Intelligence
Technical
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis and Hugging Face
How does Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash stack up?
Compare side-by-side with other efficient models.
Model Information
Pricing
| Token Type | Cost per 1M tokens | Cost per 1K tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.10 | $0.000100 |
| Output | $0.40 | $0.000400 |
Live Performance
Live endpoint metrics ā refreshed every 30 minutes.
Leaderboard Categories
External Resources
Explore Related Models
Data sourced from OpenRouter API, Artificial Analysis and Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard. Scores are editorially curated by our team.
Last updated: April 24, 2026 12:17 pm